Examples of the best abstracts submitted to your 2012-2013 selection that is abstract when it comes to ninth annual new york State University graduate student history conference.

Examples of the best abstracts submitted to your 2012-2013 selection that is abstract when it comes to ninth annual new york State University graduate student history conference.

Sample 1: “Asserting Rights, Reclaiming Space: District of Marshpee v. Phineas Fish, 1833-1843”

From May of 1833 to March of 1834, the Mashpee Wampancag tribe of Cape Cod Massachusetts waged an campaign that is aggressive gain political and religious autonomy from the state. In March of 1834, the Massachusetts legislature passed an act disbanding the white guardians appointed to conduct affairs when it comes to Mashpee tribe and incorporated Mashpee as an district that is indian. The Mashpee tribe’s fight to replace self-government and control over land and resources represents a substantial “recover of Native space.” Equally significant is really what happened once that space was recovered.

The main topic of this paper addresses an understudied and essential period in the annals associated with Mashpee Wampanoag tribe. Despite a body that is growing of regarding the Mashpee, scholars largely neglect the time scale between 1834 and 1869. This paper looks due to the fact Mashpee tribe’s campaign to dismiss Harvard appointed minister Phineas Fish; the battle to regain the parsonage he occupied, its resources, plus the community meetinghouse. This paper will argue the tribe asserted its power within the political and physical landscape to reclaim their meetinghouse as well as the parsonage land. Ultimately, this assertion contributed to shaping, strengthening, and remaking Mashpee community identity. This study examines legislative reports, petitions, letters, and legal documents to make a narrative of Native agency into the antebellum period. Note: This is part of my larger thesis project (in progress0 “Mashpee Wampanoag Government Formation as well as the Evolving Community Identity when you look at the District of Marshpee, 1834-1849.”

Sample 2: “Private Paths to public venues: Local Actors together with development of National Parklands into the American South”

This paper explores the connections between private individuals, government entities, and non-governmental organizations in the creation of parklands through the American South. While current historiography primarily credits the us government with all the development of parks and protection of natural wonders, a study of parklands when you look at the Southern United States reveals a reoccurring connection between private initiative and park creation. Secondary literature occasionally reflects the necessity of local and non-government sources for the preservation of land, yet these works still emphasize the significance of a national bureaucracy setting the tone fore the parks movement. Some works, including Jacoby’s Crimes Against Nature examine local actors, but focus on opposition towards the imposition of brand new rules governing land when confronted with some threat that is outside. The importance of local individuals in the creation of parklands remains and understudies aspect of American environmental history in spite of scholarly recognition of non-government agencies and local initiative. Several examples when you look at the American South raise concerns about the narrative that is traditional governmental hegemony against local resistance. This paper argues for widespread, sustained interest in both nature preservation plus in creating spaces for public recreation in the local level, and finds that the “private path to public parks” merits further investigation.

Note: This paper, entitled “Private Paths to Public Parks within the American South” was subsequently selected for publication within the NC State Graduate Journal of History.

Sample 3: Untitled

Previous generations of English Historians have produced a rich literature in regards to the Levellers and their role into the English Civil Wars (1642-1649), primarily centered on the Putney Debates and their contributions to Anglophone legal and thought that is political. Typically, their push to extend the franchise and espousal of a theory of popular sovereignty has been central to accounts of Civil War radicalism. Other revisionist accounts depict them as a fragmented sect of millenarian radicals whose religious bent marginalized and possibility which they might make lasting contributions to English politics or society. This paper seeks to locate a Leveller theory of religious toleration, while explaining how their conception of political activity overlapped their ideas that are religious. In the place of concentrating on John Lilburne, often taken as the public face regarding the Leveller movement, this paper will concentrate on the equally intriguing and a lot more thinker that is consistent William Walwyn. Surveying his personal background, published writings, popular involvement when you look at the Leveller movement, and attacks launched by his critics, I hope to declare that Walwyn’s unique contribution to Anglophone political thought was his defense of religious pluralism in the face of violent sectarians who sought to wield control of the Church of England. Even though Levellers were ultimately suppressed, Walwyn’s commitment to a society that is tolerant a secular state should not be minimized but rather recognized as part of a bigger debate about Church-State relations across early modern Europe. Ultimately this paper is designed to contribute to the rich historiography of religious toleration and popular politics more broadly.

Sample 4: “Establishing a National Memory of Citizen Slaughter: a full case Study of this First Memory Site to Mass Murder in United States History – Edmond, Oklahoma, 1986-1989”

Since 1989, memory sites to events of mass college homework helper murder have never only proliferated rapidly–they are becoming the expectation that is normative American society. When it comes to vast majority of American history, however, events commonly labeled as “mass murder” have led to no permanent memory sites plus the sites of perpetration themselves have traditionally been either obliterated or rectified so that both the community in addition to nation could forget the tragedy and move ahead. This all changed on May 29, 1989 once the community of Edmond, Oklahoma officially dedicated the “Golden Ribbon” memorial towards the thirteen people killed in the infamous “post office shooting” of 1986. In this paper I investigate the way it is of Edmond to be able to understand why it became the memory that is first for this kind in united states of america history. I argue that the small town of Edmond’s unique political abnormalities at the time regarding the shooting, in conjunction with the near total community involvement established ideal conditions when it comes to emergence for this unique form of memory site. I also conduct a historiography of this usage of “the ribbon” to be able to illustrate how this has end up being the symbol of memories of violence and death in American society within the late 20th century. Lastly, I illustrate how the lack that is notable of between people active in the Edmond and Oklahoma City cases following the 1995 Murrah Federal Building bombing–despite the close geographic and temporal proximity of these cases–illustrates this routinely isolated nature of commemorating mass murder and starkly renders the surprising wide range of aesthetic similarities why these memory sites share.

Sample 5: “Roman Urns and Sarcophagi: The search for Postmortem Identity through the Pax Romana”

“I am, the answer is ash and burnt embers;” thus read an anonymous early Roman’s burial inscription if you want to know who. The Romans dealt with death in lots of ways which incorporated a selection of cultural conventions and beliefs–or non-beliefs as with the case associated with “ash and embers.” The romans practiced cremation almost exclusively–as the laconic eloquence of the anonymous Roman also succinctly explained by the turn of the first century of this era. Cremation vanished by the third century, replaced by the practice of the distant past because of the century that is fifth. Burial first began to take hold within the western Roman Empire during the early century that is second with the appearance of finely-crafted sarcophagi, but elites through the Roman world failed to talk about the practices of cremation and burial at length. Therefore archaeological evidence, primarily in type of burial vessels such as for instance urns and sarcophagi represented the only real place to look to investigate the transitional to inhumation in the world that is roman. This paper analyzed a tiny corpus of such vessels so that you can identify symbolic elements which demarcate individual identities in death, comparing the patterns of these symbols to the fragments of text available relating to death in the Roman world. The analysis determined that the transition to inhumantion was a movement due to a heightened desire in the right section of Romans to preserve identity in death during and following the Pax Romana.